By Billy Roper
Coordinator, The ShieldWall Network
The coming civil war and Balkanization of America will see a reversal of urbanism and the Jewish cosmopolitanism it feeds like an artery delivering the life blood of an organism to its parasites. The most ‘diverse’ areas racially, the coastlands and cities, are the most populous, and the more rural areas of the currently United States, such as the West, Midwest, and Upper South, are the most homogeneously White.
Walther Darre was a National Socialist philosopher who developed the idea of ‘Blood and Soil’, the concept that a people are most healthy when they are tied to the land as their own racial nation, or ethnostate. It is for this reason that the cultures of the future White ethnostates in Ozarkia, Appalachia, New Albion, and Heartland will differ from one another, as well they should. The regions differ demographically, climatically, and topographically, as well.
Similar to Darre’s ‘back to the land’ movement which gave rise to the desire for ‘living space’, the voluntary immigration of White flight out of racially mixed urban areas to more homogeneous White rural areas is an ongoing expression of the instinctive ties our Aryan people feel to nature and to the soil. The essence of the theory involves the mutual and long-term relationship between a people and the land that it occupies and cultivates. The essence of the reality is people voting with their feet to move to places away from dense population centers, to regions where they are among the majority, and can be more self sufficient and healthy, both psychologically as well as physically.
With the collapse and implosion of the myth of multiracial democracy simultaneous to the Balkanization of America will come a return to more disciplined and trustworthy forms of governance in balance with a more dispersed population. The false idea of egalitarianism and its resulting population bottleneck will return society in North America to a more sane realization of man’s inherent inequality with his fellow man: both between the races, as well as within ours. It will be recognized logically that universal suffrage is not to the benefit of our people. It will be remembered that most of our people, in fact, as all people, are naturally followers, rather than leaders, and they would be more comfortable abdicating the more tedious and difficult decisions in life to others, so long as they are provided with a job and a sense of purpose and meaning, as well as enough to eat and shelter, et cetera, to satisfy their basic needs.
Indeed, it is a rank disservice to expect most of our people to make important choices on their own, or to plan out their own lives, much less direct the affairs of the nation either directly or indirectly. It is just as cruel and unjust as leaving a person with Down’s Syndrome to decide how they will feed themselves and survive. Freedom and liberty are often not gifts; on the contrary, to most people they are simply burdens which they are not well equipped to bear by themselves. Furthermore, personal liberties granted at the potential risk of the best interests of the people as a whole are not beneficial to the common good. On that, we can all agree.
The multiracial cities will likely become slaughter houses. Millions may die through violence. Millions more will flee the urban areas as refugees, possessing few if any skills suited to help them survive the new reality, and facing a lingering death through starvation or disease, potentially, without leadership and guidance.
Logically, then, post-Balk America will need local, organic forms of governance where unskilled urban evacuees and refugees will have a place of sanctuary and a role, under the guidance of rural land owners and leaders who will provide protection to them in exchange for their unskilled labor and loyalty in helping defend the community. We used to have a name for that kind of system. We called it Feudalism.
Especially if there is a commensurate breakdown in transportation, communication, technology, and trade, the agricultural output necessary to feed even a fraction of our people can only be maintained without modern farm machinery by reverting back to traditional farm machinery: mass human physical labor. Likewise, with the vacuum of power at the governmental level, protection and defense of the people and law and order will require someone at the top of the pyramid.
Whites who have already left diversity behind and relocated to and established themselves as persons of influence in racially homogeneous seedbed ethnostate areas in rural regions of the country will naturally maintain their status as independent freeholders, craftsmen, and property owners. Some of them may even offer their services to provide the leadership and governance which those who defer withdrawing from multiracialism until the Balk occurs will require.
Therefore, allowing for some exceptions in regions where a different form of government may better suit the spirit and culture of the people, Darreian Feudalism may well be the future for some of the coming White Ethnostates.
Will you choose to establish your family now in a majority White seedbed ethnostate area so you and your children can be the new nobility? Or will you find an excuse to wallow in diversity until the time comes when the best hope you have left is to pick someone else’s crops for them, peasant?